英文字典中文字典


英文字典中文字典51ZiDian.com



中文字典辞典   英文字典 a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h   i   j   k   l   m   n   o   p   q   r   s   t   u   v   w   x   y   z       







请输入英文单字，中文词皆可：


请选择你想看的字典辞典：
单词字典翻译
opportunisme查看　opportunisme　在百度字典中的解释百度英翻中〔查看〕
opportunisme查看　opportunisme　在Google字典中的解释Google英翻中〔查看〕
opportunisme查看　opportunisme　在Yahoo字典中的解释Yahoo英翻中〔查看〕

安装中文字典英文字典查询工具!


中文字典英文字典工具:
选择颜色:
输入中英文单字

































































英文字典中文字典相关资料:


  • What Is a Penal Code § 995 Motion under California Law?
    It also does not exist when the holding order is based upon incompetent or inadmissible evidence People v Scoma (1969) 71 Cal 2d 332, 335, People v Valenti (1957) 49 Cal 2d 199, 203 [illegally seized evidence]; Whitman v Superior Court (1991) 54 Cal 3d 1063, 1083 [hearsay]
  • IN THE APPELLATE COURT under Rule 23(e)(1). Court, IL
    ¶ 17 The court rendered its decision on the record, concluding the State proved by a preponderance of the evidence defendant violated an order of protection he had notice of on February 11, 2017 The court described the evidence of the probation violation as
  • Rule 103 - Rulings on Evidence - Federal Rules of Evidence
    Wayne Corp , 621 F 2d 777 (5th Cir 1980) Some courts have taken a more flexible approach, holding that renewal is not required if the issue decided is one that (1) was fairly presented to the trial court for an initial ruling, (2) may be decided as a final matter before the evidence is actually offered, and (3) was ruled on definitively by
  • 995 Writing Sample - Testimonial Evidence
    2 The holding order was based upon inadmissible hearsay evidence presented at the preliminary 3 examination There was no other evidence to support a rational basis for the charge of sale of a 4 substance other than a controlled substance For these reasons, Mr Jones respectfully requests that 5 Count One be dismissed
  • Preliminary Hearings - §3. 28 The Holding Order
    We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us
  • Change of Venue, Convenience of Witnesses and Burdens of Proof
    Motions pursuant to CPLR 510(3) “are addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court and, absent an improvident exercise of that discretion, the trial court’s order will not be disturbed on appeal ” Raghavendra v Stober, 171 A D 3d 814, 816 (2 nd Dep’t 2018) (citations omitted); see also Aldridge v
  • THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR . . .
    court, (2) raised by the appellant, (3) raised in a timely manner, and (4) raised to the [trial] court with sufficient specificity ") 2 We hold Frisco's argument that the circuit court abused its discretion by considering inadmissible evidence at the heari ng is not preserved for appellate
  • What is a 995 motion in California? - LegalKnowledgeBase. com
    Score: 4 1 5 (52 votes) A 995 motion is an appeal of the preliminary hearing judge's decision to set the case for trial and often called a "motion to set aside the information ” Typically, a judge will grant the motion if they find there were insufficient legal grounds to hold the defendant over for trial
  • Calabro v. State (995 So. 2d 307) - vLex United States
    ANALYSIS When reviewing orders on motions to suppress, appellate courts "accept the trial court 's factual findings if there is evidence to support them, while reviewing the court 's legal conclusions de novo " Nelson v State, 850 So 2d 514, 522 (Fla 2003) (describing the standard of review for orders on motions to suppress alleging constitutional violations)
  • Menifee v. Superior Court :: 2020 :: California Courts of Appeal . . .
    Menifee moved to dismiss the gang participation count and the gang enhancement allegations pursuant to section 995 The court of appeal upheld the denial of the motion While certain components of the gang expert’s testimony were inadmissible, the remaining admissible evidence presented at the preliminary hearing was sufficient to hold
  • IN THE APPELLATE COURT under Rule 23(e)(1). Court, IL
    ¶ 17 The court rendered its decision on the record, concluding the State proved by a preponderance of the evidence defendant violated an order of protection he had notice of on February 11, 2017 The court described the evidence of the probation violation as
  • Stumpff v. Riverside Bd. of Zoning Appeals - Supreme Court of Ohio
    of a witness and certain documentary evidence {¶ 2} We hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by affirming the Board’s decision because Stumpff did not meet his burden to prove a nonconforming use In addition, we hold that the trial court did not err by considering inadmissible evidence, and that the court did not err by
  • Can Jurors Disregard Inadmissible Evidence? Using the Multiphase . . .
    states that the probative value of evidence must outweigh its prejudicial impact in order to be admissible This balancing test is the prevailing method attorneys use to argue for Other notable decisions were made by the California Supreme Court (holding that evidence of inadmissible prior child molestation was not prejudicial where
  • Setting-aside a subpoena - gavinjayapal. com
    Subpoenas are a commonplace document in civil litigation They are utilised to compel the attendance of a witness (or to compel the production of documents) A subpoena may be issued to anyone within the realm In Ismail v Hasnul [1968] 1 MLJ 108, the FC emphasised:The practice in all courts has been that a subpoena may be issued against anybody, be he a Minister of the Government or a nonentity





中文字典-英文字典  2005-2009