英文字典中文字典


英文字典中文字典51ZiDian.com



中文字典辞典   英文字典 a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h   i   j   k   l   m   n   o   p   q   r   s   t   u   v   w   x   y   z       







请输入英文单字，中文词皆可：


请选择你想看的字典辞典：
单词字典翻译
sympathised查看　sympathised　在百度字典中的解释百度英翻中〔查看〕
sympathised查看　sympathised　在Google字典中的解释Google英翻中〔查看〕
sympathised查看　sympathised　在Yahoo字典中的解释Yahoo英翻中〔查看〕

安装中文字典英文字典查询工具!


中文字典英文字典工具:
选择颜色:
输入中英文单字

































































英文字典中文字典相关资料:


  • Facts and Case Summary - Miranda v. Arizona - United States Courts
    In this case, the Supreme Court was asked to decide if the age of a juvenile being questioned by police should be taken into consideration when deciding if he or she is in police custody and, therefore, entitled to a Miranda warning
  • Miranda v. Arizona | Constitution Center
    Miranda’s oral and written confessions are now held inadmissible under the Court’s new rules One is entitled to feel astonished that the Constitution can be read to produce this result
  • Miranda v. Arizona - Wikipedia
    Because of the defendant's low I Q and poor English-language skills, the U S Court of Appeals ruled that it was a "clear error" when the district court found that Garibay had "knowingly and intelligently waived his Miranda rights "
  • Miranda v. Arizona (1966): Case Summary and Ruling
    Miranda v Arizona (1966) is the Supreme Court decision that requires police to inform suspects of their constitutional rights before questioning them in custody In a 5–4 ruling, the Court held that without specific warnings about the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney, statements obtained during custodial interrogation cannot be used as evidence at trial 1 The decision
  • Miranda v. Arizona Case Summary: Ruling and Rights
    Learn how Miranda v Arizona came about, what the Supreme Court actually decided, and how those familiar warnings hold up — and fall short — in practice today
  • Miranda v. Arizona | Definition, Background, Facts | Britannica
    Arizona reversed an Arizona court’s conviction of Ernesto Miranda on charges of kidnapping and rape
  • 1966: Miranda v. Arizona - A Latinx Resource Guide: Civil Rights Cases . . .
    In a 5-4 Supreme Court decision Miranda v Arizona (1966) ruled that an arrested individual is entitled to rights against self-incrimination and to an attorney under the 5th and 6th Amendments of the United States Constitution
  • Overview - Miranda v. Arizona: The Rights to Justice (March 13, 1963 . . .
    The decision that gave rise to the Miranda warning and the verb “Mirandize” was preserved in the U S law that followed the Supreme Court’s ruling, which found that the Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights of Ernesto Arturo Miranda were violated at the moment of his arrest and trial
  • Miranda v. Arizona (1966): The Miranda Rights Case | LawLion
    Miranda v Arizona (1966) case brief Learn who Ernesto Miranda was, what the Miranda warning says, why Chief Justice Warren's 5-4 ruling
  • Miranda Rights Supreme Court Cases
    Miranda Rights Supreme Court Cases The Fifth Amendment to the U S Constitution protects people suspected of crimes from self-incrimination In Miranda v Arizona, the Supreme Court applied this principle to the context of police questioning





中文字典-英文字典  2005-2009