英文字典中文字典


英文字典中文字典51ZiDian.com



中文字典辞典   英文字典 a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h   i   j   k   l   m   n   o   p   q   r   s   t   u   v   w   x   y   z       







请输入英文单字，中文词皆可：

equals    音标拼音: ['ikwəlz]
equals
等 相等


请选择你想看的字典辞典：
单词字典翻译
equals查看　equals　在百度字典中的解释百度英翻中〔查看〕
equals查看　equals　在Google字典中的解释Google英翻中〔查看〕
equals查看　equals　在Yahoo字典中的解释Yahoo英翻中〔查看〕

安装中文字典英文字典查询工具!


中文字典英文字典工具:
选择颜色:
输入中英文单字

































































英文字典中文字典相关资料:


  • Equal versus Equals - English Language Usage Stack Exchange
    Equals is generally used unless using a verb "is" and the phrase "equal to" While reading 3 ft = 1 yd you would say "three feet equals a yard," or "three feet is equal to a yard"
  • Is equal to or equals - English Language Usage Stack Exchange
    Are both is equal to and equals similar in meaning? Which is the more natural? For example, one plus one equals two or one plus one is equal to two
  • Equal, is equal to, equals, are equal to - English Language Usage . . .
    Equals is correct, as is is equal to There are some instances when one might use are, but that would be limited to when a quantity separates are from equal to, and would sound correct, but not necessarily be mathematically correct
  • Equals - a verb or not? - English Language Usage Stack Exchange
    But in the example in question, equals is not actually being used as a verb When used as a verb, equals is used in the following manner: X equals Y But here is a simplified version of the example sentence in question: They stood as equals In fact, if you look at the heading Recent Examples on the Web: Noun, you'll see the following example:
  • How to read “E = (mc)²” so as not to mistake for “E = mc²”
    According to one of the questions already asked on EL U, “E = mc²” is read as E equals M C squared How do we read “E = (mc)²” so that it is not mistaken for “E = mc²”?
  • What is the origin of != in the meaning not equal to?
    As a programmer I have always assumed that using != as meaning not equal to when writing text (usually on the internet) came from programming languages Is this true or is the origin different?
  • Four plus two equals six (or is equal to six or is six)
    four plus two equals six In your first example sentence, " equal " is being used as a verb in the third person singular form: equals four plus two is equal to six In your second example, " equal " is being used as an adjective, and so it needs to employ a linking verb (in this case, " be " or " is ") before it The " to " after it is a
  • Is I believe x does not equal y the same as I dont believe x equals y
    I don't believe that x equals y simply means that a belief about the equality exists, but you do not share that belief If you substitute another verb for believe, the difference may be clearer: I know that x doesn't equal y I have actual knowledge that x and y are not equal Quite possibly I can show you facts to support this
  • X equals Y vs. X is equal to Y - English Language Usage Stack . . .
    In programming, when people read or dictate code, it is common for a spoken "X equals Y" to literally mean "x = y" which is an assignment "X is equal to Y", prefaced with e g "if" or "when" would be unambiguously used to indicate a check for equality, as in "x == y"
  • What is the purpose of using the word coequal
    For example, the term "first among equals" is common when considering the Pope, prime ministers, chief justice etc I don't find Wikidiff's explanation wrong, I just see a lot of holes in its reasoning I think you have a point that many people and institutions would use "coequal" rather than "equal" to emphasise one quality over the other





中文字典-英文字典  2005-2009