sql - Transaction count after EXECUTE indicates a mismatching number of . . . Exec USPStoredProcName I get the following error: Transaction count after EXECUTE indicates a mismatching number of BEGIN and COMMIT statements Previous count = 1, current count = 0 I have read the answers in other such questions and am unable to find where exactly the commit count is getting messed up
The transaction log for the database is full - Stack Overflow I have a long running process that holds open a transaction for the full duration I have no control over the way this is executed Because a transaction is held open for the full duration, whe
How do you clear the SQL Server transaction log? The transaction log contains a lot of useful data that can be read using a third-party transaction log reader (it can be read manually but with extreme effort though) The transaction log is also a must when it comes to point in time recovery, so don’t just throw it away, but make sure you back it up beforehand
concurrency - What is a database transaction? - Stack Overflow A transaction is a unit of work that you want to treat as "a whole " It has to either happen in full or not at all A classical example is transferring money from one bank account to another To do that you have first to withdraw the amount from the source account, and then deposit it to the destination account The operation has to succeed in full If you stop halfway, the money will be lost
Network access for Distributed Transaction Manager (MSDTC) has been . . . Inner Exception The MSDTC transaction manager was unable to pull the transaction from the source transaction manager due to communication problems Possible causes are: a firewall is present and it doesn't have an exception for the MSDTC process, the two machines cannot find each other by their NetBIOS names, or the support for network
Row was updated or deleted by another transaction (or unsaved-value . . . optimistic locking consists in detecting that another transaction has updated deleted the same row, and throwing the exception you're getting in this case If you have a version field, you're already using optimistic locking, and this is what throws the exception Pessimistic locking will make your application slow and subject to deadlocks
This SqlTransaction has completed; it is no longer usable . . . { return transaction Connection Query<T>(command, new DynamicParameters(param), transaction, commandType: CommandType StoredProcedure); } } } It looks as though the outer using was closing the underlying connection thus any attempts to commit or rollback the transaction threw up the message "This SqlTransaction has completed; it is no longer