sql - Transaction count after EXECUTE indicates a mismatching number of . . . Exec USPStoredProcName I get the following error: Transaction count after EXECUTE indicates a mismatching number of BEGIN and COMMIT statements Previous count = 1, current count = 0 I have read the answers in other such questions and am unable to find where exactly the commit count is getting messed up
concurrency - What is a database transaction? - Stack Overflow A transaction is a unit of work that you want to treat as "a whole " It has to either happen in full or not at all A classical example is transferring money from one bank account to another To do that you have first to withdraw the amount from the source account, and then deposit it to the destination account The operation has to succeed in full If you stop halfway, the money will be lost
The transaction log for the database is full - Stack Overflow I have a long running process that holds open a transaction for the full duration I have no control over the way this is executed Because a transaction is held open for the full duration, whe
Getting Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction even . . . mysql> update customer set account_import_id = 1; ERROR 1205 (HY000): Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction I'm not using a transaction, so why would I be getting this error? I even tried restarting my MySQL server and it didn't help The table has 406,733 rows
How do you clear the SQL Server transaction log? The transaction log contains a lot of useful data that can be read using a third-party transaction log reader (it can be read manually but with extreme effort though) The transaction log is also a must when it comes to point in time recovery, so don’t just throw it away, but make sure you back it up beforehand
How does a large transaction log affect performance? A larger transaction log file in itself if not detrimental to performance as SQL server writes to the log sequentially, so provided you are managing your overall log size and allocation of additional space appropriately you should not be concerned
This SqlTransaction has completed; it is no longer usable . . . { return transaction Connection Query<T>(command, new DynamicParameters(param), transaction, commandType: CommandType StoredProcedure); } } } It looks as though the outer using was closing the underlying connection thus any attempts to commit or rollback the transaction threw up the message "This SqlTransaction has completed; it is no longer
Row was updated or deleted by another transaction (or unsaved-value . . . optimistic locking consists in detecting that another transaction has updated deleted the same row, and throwing the exception you're getting in this case If you have a version field, you're already using optimistic locking, and this is what throws the exception Pessimistic locking will make your application slow and subject to deadlocks